G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile averages 10.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 20,312 vs 22,167 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (110W vs 200W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 9.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 10.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 9.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $399 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	152 FPS	163 FPS
medium	137 FPS	150 FPS
high	118 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	138 FPS
medium	107 FPS	115 FPS
high	91 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	80 FPS
medium	65 FPS	68 FPS
high	50 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	46 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	425 FPS	422 FPS
medium	366 FPS	365 FPS
high	296 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	326 FPS
medium	229 FPS	272 FPS
high	190 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	179 FPS
medium	114 FPS	155 FPS
high	96 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	108 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	859 FPS	870 FPS
medium	693 FPS	712 FPS
high	602 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	691 FPS
medium	529 FPS	561 FPS
high	452 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	374 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	470 FPS
medium	346 FPS	383 FPS
high	275 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	249 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	580 FPS	459 FPS
medium	514 FPS	408 FPS
high	424 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	381 FPS
medium	427 FPS	340 FPS
high	335 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	242 FPS
medium	266 FPS	221 FPS
high	234 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 22,167 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 9.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 152 Tensor cores vs 232.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	20,312	22,167+9%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4864	7424+53%
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1665 MHz
ROPs	80	80
TMUs	152	232+53%
L1 Cache	4.8 MB	7.3 MB+52%
L2 Cache	4 MB	48 MB+1100%
Ray Tracing Cores	38	58+53%
Tensor Cores	152	232+53%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+4%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	48 MB+1100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 58.1% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	200W	110W-45%
Recommended PSU	600W	150W-75%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	101.6	201.5+98%