
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅54.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌12.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅54.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌12.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX A2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A2000 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A2000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX A2000's 13,464 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 50.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 152 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+51% | 13,464 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+46% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+103% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+39% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+67% | 48 |
| TMUs | 152+46% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+45% | 3.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+46% | 26 |
| Tensor Cores | 152+46% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 192.3+89% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 11.3% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 70.2% better value. The RTX A2000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-11% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+70% | 29.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA106 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












