G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅85.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
❌195.1% longer card at 242mm vs 82mm.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 242mm, a 160mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅85.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 242mm, a 160mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
❌195.1% longer card at 242mm vs 82mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX A2000 Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 85.8% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 11,117 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 82.7% more raw performance headroom and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 85.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 82.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (35W vs 200W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX A2000 Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

Yes. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 200W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti currently gives you 82.7% higher G3D Mark and 85.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	152 FPS	105 FPS
medium	137 FPS	88 FPS
high	118 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	91 FPS
medium	107 FPS	75 FPS
high	91 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	36 FPS
medium	65 FPS	33 FPS
high	50 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	425 FPS	124 FPS
medium	366 FPS	100 FPS
high	296 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	90 FPS
medium	229 FPS	70 FPS
high	190 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	55 FPS
medium	114 FPS	43 FPS
high	96 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	859 FPS	500 FPS
medium	693 FPS	400 FPS
high	602 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	375 FPS
medium	529 FPS	300 FPS
high	452 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	250 FPS
medium	346 FPS	200 FPS
high	275 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	125 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	580 FPS	229 FPS
medium	514 FPS	196 FPS
high	424 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	176 FPS
medium	427 FPS	153 FPS
high	335 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	99 FPS
medium	266 FPS	78 FPS
high	234 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 11,117 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 82.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1177 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) with 152 Tensor cores vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	20,312+83%	11,117
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4864+90%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+169%	6.026 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+41%	1177 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	152+90%	80
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+92%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	38+90%	20
Tensor Cores	152+90%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
TDP	200W	35W-83%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	82mm
Height	112mm	4mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	101.6	317.6+213%