
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A5500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+18.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅52.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 152).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,120 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+18.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅52.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 152).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,120 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX A5500 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A5500 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 80 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 90 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A5500 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
The RTX A5500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,120 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 17,120 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 18.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A5500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7,424 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 22.27 TFLOPS (RTX A5500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 58 (RTX A5500 Mobile) with 152 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+19% | 17,120 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 7424+53% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 22.27 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+11% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 232+53% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 7.3 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 58+53% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 232+53% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A5500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A5500 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A5500 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 165W — a 19.2% difference. The RTX A5500 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX A5500 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 165W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 103.8+2% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A5500 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GA103 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #73 | #110 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












