
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅70.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅70.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 13,209 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 53.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 14 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) with 152 Tensor cores vs 56.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+54% | 13,209 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+79% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2520 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 80+233% | 24 |
| TMUs | 152+171% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+167% | 1.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+171% | 14 |
| Tensor Cores | 152+171% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 377.4+271% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GB207 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #73 | #244 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












