
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

T400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+462.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 153.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅+462.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 153.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than T400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and T400

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
T400
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the T400's 3,609 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 462.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the T400 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+463% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+1167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+1381% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+17% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+533% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1163% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (T400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the T400's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 120.3+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the T400 launched at $180. The T400 costs 54.9% less ($219 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 20.1 (T400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 153.2% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $180-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+153% | 20.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU117 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #532 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













