
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

TITAN Xp
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 225.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 225.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than TITAN Xp?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN Xp still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 825 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and TITAN Xp

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the TITAN Xp's 18,752 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 8.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,840 (TITAN Xp). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+8% | 18,752 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+27% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+33% | 12.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+5% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 240+58% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+243% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN Xp relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN Xp has 12 GB. The TITAN Xp offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) — a 22.3% advantage for the TITAN Xp. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (TITAN Xp) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s+22% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (TITAN Xp). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the TITAN Xp's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 600W (TITAN Xp). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+35% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the TITAN Xp launched at $1199. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 66.7% less ($800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 15.6 (TITAN Xp) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 226.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-67% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+226% | 15.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP102 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | April 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #87 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












