G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro K2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro K2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅336.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 621.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌150% higher power demand at 170W vs 68W.
❌19.2% longer card at 242mm vs 203mm.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 68W instead of 170W, a 102W reduction.
✅Measures 203mm instead of 242mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
52% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 336.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 374.7% in PassMark G3D (16,995 vs 3,580), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $171 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 621.5% (51.7 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro K2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro K2200's 3,580 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 374.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
G3D Mark Score	16,995+375%	3,580
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+460%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+785%	1.439 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1777 MHz+58%	1124 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	112+180%	40
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+1029%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	NVDEC 1
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
TDP	170W	68W-60%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	203mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	100.0+90%	52.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 34.2% cheaper ($171 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.2 (Quadro K2200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 618.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro K2200
MSRP	$329-34%	$500
Performance per Dollar	51.7+618%	7.2
Codename	GA106	GM107
Release	January 12 2021	July 22 2014
Ranking	#114	#534

Search GeForce RTX 3060 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.