
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅149.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.
Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌29.2% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro P2000
2017Why buy it
- ✅149.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 5 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌29.2% HIGHER MSRP$425 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro P2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro P2000

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 144%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+144% | 6,964 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+250% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+320% | 3.031 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+20% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+821% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+140% | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+140% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 201mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+8% | 92.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 22.6% less ($96 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 215.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-23% | $425 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+215% | 16.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP106 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #114 | #346 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












