
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+41.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,671 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 760.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌507.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅+41.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,671 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 760.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌507.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon PRO V710?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO V710 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 56 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 87 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 135 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon PRO V710

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 41.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+42% | 12,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+4% | 3456 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2000 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 216+93% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+367% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 54+93% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 7.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 158W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+32% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 83.5% less ($1671 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 761.7% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-84% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+762% | 6.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #114 | #196 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












