
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+34.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,615 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+34.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,615 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 8200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 12,615 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 34.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+35% | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+19% | 10.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+18% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+298% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 30% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-26% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+82% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 67.1% less ($670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 310.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-67% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+310% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #114 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












