
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+34.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+34.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 34.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+34% | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+61% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+3% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 384 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 5.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-6% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+42% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #114 | #751 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












