
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

Quadro RTX 5000
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU vs Quadro RTX 5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU vs Quadro RTX 5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU vs Quadro RTX 5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2021Why buy it
- ✅6.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ❌26.1% higher power demand at 290W vs 230W.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 290W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU vs Quadro RTX 5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,196 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU scores 15,196 and the Quadro RTX 5000 reaches 15,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1815 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000) with 192 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,196 | 15,443+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+100% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+95% | 11.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 1815 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 384+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU draws 290W versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 230W — a 23.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 290W | 230W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 52.4 | 67.1+28% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2299 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU104 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #50 | #143 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














