
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 165W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 66.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 5632 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 44 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,621 points.

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Fevereiro 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2695 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,486 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 17,621 and the Radeon RX 7650 GRE reaches 18,486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,632 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Raw compute: 15.88 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 22.08 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Boost clocks: 1410 MHz vs 2695 MHz. Ray tracing: 44 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) with 176 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,621 | 18,486+5% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5632+175% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.88 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1410 MHz | 2695 MHz+91% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+38% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.5 MB+1000% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 44+38% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7650 GRE. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile draws 140W versus the Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 165W — a 16.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-15% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 125.9+12% | 112.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 7650 GRE (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $279 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | Fevereiro 2025 |
| Ranking | #100 | #96 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














