G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

2021

Why buy it

✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 223.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌314.3% higher power demand at 290W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 290W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
233.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 38.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 Ada Generation instead at 24,046 vs 23,295, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 223.3% (38.9 vs 12.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 4000 Ada Generation has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,295 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 23,295 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 192 Tensor cores vs 192.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	23,295	24,046+3%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	6144	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	21.75 TFLOPS	26.73 TFLOPS+23%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+13%	1560 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	192	192
L1 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	48 MB+1100%
Ray Tracing Cores	48	48
Tensor Cores	192	192

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 608 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 68.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	608 GB/s+69%	360 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+60%	160-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	48 MB+1100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti draws 290W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 122.2% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP	290W	70W-76%
Recommended PSU	750W	750W
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	80.3	343.5+328%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti came in at $599, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti was 70% cheaper ($1400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers 224.2% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP	$599-70%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	38.9+224%	12.0
Codename	GA104	AD104
Release	May 31 2021	August 9 2023
Ranking	#50	#47

Search GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on Amazon

Search RTX 4000 Ada Generation on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.