
GeForce RTX 3080 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3080
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3080
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score and 140% more VRAM (24 GB vs 10 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3080.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $400 versus $1,700 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell, it costs 76% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 302.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+302.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($400) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,700) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3080
The GeForce RTX 3080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 8704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,071 points. Launch price was $699.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3080 scores 25,071 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 5.7%. The GeForce RTX 3080 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 8,704 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 29.77 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 272 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,071 | 26,498+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8704 | 8960+3% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.77 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2055 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 272 | 280+3% |
| L1 Cache | 8.5 MB | 8.8 MB+4% |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 48 MB+860% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | 70+3% |
| Tensor Cores | 272 | 280+3% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 760 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 75.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080. Bus width: 320-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 5 MB (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB | 24 GB+140% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 760 GB/s+76% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+67% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 48 MB+860% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 draws 320W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 140W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.3 | 189.3+142% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3080 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999 and now averages $1700. The GeForce RTX 3080 costs 76.5% less ($1300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 62.7 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 15.6 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3080 offers 301.9% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-65% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400-76% | $1700 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.7+302% | 15.6 |
| Codename | GA102 | GB203 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #41 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















