
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+183% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,148 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅+183% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,148 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro M4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Quadro M4000M

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Quadro M4000M's 6,148 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 183%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+183% | 6,148 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+240% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+784% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+150% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+70% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+815% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M4000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro M4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+77% | 61.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












