
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+146.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅+146.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro M5000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Quadro M5000M

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Quadro M5000M's 7,056 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 146.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M5000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1 (Quadro M5000M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1051 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+147% | 7,056 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+183% | 1,536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+637% | 2.995 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+141% | 1051 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+42% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+668% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M5000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Quadro M5000M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Quadro M5000M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+54% | 70.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












