
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅135.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅135.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 411 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 12,173 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 42.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) with 136 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+43% | 12,173 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+212% | 7.066 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+84% | 1380 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+72% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 40+18% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 320+135% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 152.2+40% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












