
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+37.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 17,400).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+37.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,669 vs 17,400).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon RX 5700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 12,669 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 37.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+37% | 12,669 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+178% | 7.926 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+47% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 384 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+55% | 70.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












