GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce4 MX 460
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅18480.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 253943.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅6300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌45.5% longer card at 240mm vs 165mm.
GeForce4 MX 460
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 240mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce4 MX 460
The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 566175%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+566175% | 4 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1195% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2332% | 0.9072 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+877% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce4 MX 460 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce4 MX 460 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 6300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+6300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+74% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+254% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs No.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | No |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 0% difference. The GeForce4 MX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 165mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the GeForce4 MX 460 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 460 was 55.1% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce4 MX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $179-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | 0.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GF104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #59 | #652 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce4 MX 460
