G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+759% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,637 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 759% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 2,637), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 2,637 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 759%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	22,651+759%	2,637
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	4352+1033%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+2216%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+113%	64
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+760%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12.2+11%	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	PureVideo HD
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
TDP	160W	100W-38%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+436%	26.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
MSRP	$399	—
Codename	AD106	GF114
Release	May 18 2023	March 22 2012
Ranking	#59	#704

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.