
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+268.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1977.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,149 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌463.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅+268.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1977.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,149 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌463.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro K5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro K5200

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro K5200's 6,149 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 268.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+268% | 6,149 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+521% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+229% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136 | 192+41% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 36.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+36% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+245% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 82.3% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2003.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+2004% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | GK110B |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #59 | #391 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












