
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Quadro K5200
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅169.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1977.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌463.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro K5200's 6,149 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 268.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+268% | 6,149 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+521% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+229% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136 | 192+41% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K5200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 36.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+36% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+245% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 82.3% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2003.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+2004% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | GK110B |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #59 | #391 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














