
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+221% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅+221% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro M5000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro M5000M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro M5000M's 7,056 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 221%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M5000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 (Quadro M5000M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1051 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+221% | 7,056 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+183% | 1,536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+637% | 2.995 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+141% | 1051 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+42% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+668% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M5000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro M5000M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M5000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+101% | 70.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #59 | #353 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












