
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+323.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,353 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅+323.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,353 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro P2000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 5,353 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 323.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+323% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+73% | 1468 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+112% | 66.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | GP107GL |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #59 | #426 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












