G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅76.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 556.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
❌128.6% longer card at 240mm vs 105mm.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 240mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
200.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅76.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 556.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 240mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
❌128.6% longer card at 240mm vs 105mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
200.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro P4200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 76.9% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 10,376 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P4200 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 118.3% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $801 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $1,200 MSRP, and you are getting 76.9% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 118.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 556.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P4200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P4200 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,200 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro P4200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	177 FPS	127 FPS
medium	162 FPS	108 FPS
high	142 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	103 FPS
medium	118 FPS	85 FPS
high	101 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	47 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	44 FPS
medium	79 FPS	38 FPS
high	66 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	425 FPS	230 FPS
medium	359 FPS	196 FPS
high	292 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	165 FPS
medium	229 FPS	139 FPS
high	186 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	97 FPS
medium	95 FPS	80 FPS
high	77 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	855 FPS	467 FPS
medium	693 FPS	374 FPS
high	609 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	233 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	350 FPS
medium	527 FPS	280 FPS
high	452 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	175 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	233 FPS
medium	355 FPS	187 FPS
high	308 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	117 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
1080p
low	775 FPS	257 FPS
medium	639 FPS	226 FPS
high	558 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	152 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	193 FPS
medium	503 FPS	169 FPS
high	435 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	105 FPS
medium	322 FPS	87 FPS
high	298 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P4200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro P4200

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro P4200's 10,376 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 118.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1647 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
G3D Mark Score	22,651+118%	10,376
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4352+89%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+191%	7.589 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+54%	1647 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	144+6%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+412%	0.84 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
TDP	160W	100W-38%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	105mm
Height	111mm	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	141.6+36%	103.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 66.8% less ($801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 560.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).