G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅77.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 556.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
❌128.6% longer card at 240mm vs 105mm.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 240mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
200.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 118.3% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 10,376), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro P4200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $801 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $1,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 556.5% (56.8 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro P4200's 10,376 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 118.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1647 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
G3D Mark Score	22,651+118%	10,376
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4352+89%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+191%	7.589 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+54%	1647 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	144+6%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+412%	0.84 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P4200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the Quadro P4200. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
TDP	160W	100W-38%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	105mm
Height	111mm	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	141.6+36%	103.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 66.8% cheaper ($801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 560.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P4200
MSRP	$399-67%	$1200
Performance per Dollar	56.8+560%	8.6
Codename	AD106	GP104
Release	May 18 2023	February 21 2018
Ranking	#59	#266

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search Quadro P4200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.