
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅91.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 60W.
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅111.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 160W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅91.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅111.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 160W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 91 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 8,119 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 179%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) with 136 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+179% | 8,119 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+294% | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+109% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+87% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 288+112% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 60W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+5% | 135.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | TU106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #59 | #313 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












