G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+86.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅135.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 136).
✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,173 vs 22,651).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅+86.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅135.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 136).
✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,173 vs 22,651).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 12,173 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is a 2019 model from an older generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 86.1% more raw performance headroom, and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 86.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	177 FPS	162 FPS
medium	162 FPS	142 FPS
high	142 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	130 FPS
medium	118 FPS	109 FPS
high	101 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	50 FPS
medium	79 FPS	43 FPS
high	66 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	433 FPS	174 FPS
medium	363 FPS	139 FPS
high	294 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	134 FPS
medium	238 FPS	105 FPS
high	194 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	78 FPS
medium	102 FPS	63 FPS
high	84 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	40 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	855 FPS	548 FPS
medium	693 FPS	438 FPS
high	609 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	411 FPS
medium	527 FPS	329 FPS
high	452 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	205 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	274 FPS
medium	355 FPS	219 FPS
high	308 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	137 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	775 FPS	247 FPS
medium	639 FPS	214 FPS
high	558 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	189 FPS
medium	503 FPS	167 FPS
high	435 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	112 FPS
medium	322 FPS	94 FPS
high	298 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 12,173 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 86.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) with 136 Tensor cores vs 320.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	22,651+86%	12,173
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4352+70%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+212%	7.066 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+84%	1380 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	160+18%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+72%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	40+18%
Tensor Cores	136	320+135%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	160W	80W-50%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	152.2+7%