G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+225.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 307.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 60W.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 60W instead of 160W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,959 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
25.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅+225.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 307.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 60W instead of 160W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 60W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,959 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
25.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro T2000 (móvel)?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 6,959 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro T2000 (móvel) is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 225.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 225.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 307.9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro T2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro T2000 (móvel) is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro T2000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
1080p
low	177 FPS	99 FPS
medium	162 FPS	88 FPS
high	142 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	91 FPS
medium	118 FPS	77 FPS
high	101 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	45 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
1080p
low	425 FPS	195 FPS
medium	359 FPS	165 FPS
high	292 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	136 FPS
medium	229 FPS	111 FPS
high	186 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	80 FPS
medium	95 FPS	66 FPS
high	77 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
1080p
low	855 FPS	313 FPS
medium	693 FPS	251 FPS
high	609 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	235 FPS
medium	527 FPS	188 FPS
high	452 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	146 FPS
medium	355 FPS	125 FPS
high	308 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
1080p
low	775 FPS	289 FPS
medium	639 FPS	224 FPS
high	558 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	220 FPS
medium	503 FPS	167 FPS
high	435 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	103 FPS
medium	322 FPS	76 FPS
high	298 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro T2000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 6,959 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 225.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	22,651+225%	6,959
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4352+325%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+503%	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+42%	1785 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+113%	64
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 90.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro T2000 (móvel)
TDP	160W	60W-63%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+22%	116.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 20.2% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 13.9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 308.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).