G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+88.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 846.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
401.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

✅+88.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 846.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,000 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
401.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon PRO V710?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 12,000 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO V710 is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 88.8% more raw performance headroom and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $1,601 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 88.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 846.2%. Radeon PRO V710 is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO V710 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $2,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti currently gives you 88.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 846.2%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	177 FPS	215 FPS
medium	162 FPS	196 FPS
high	142 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	180 FPS
medium	118 FPS	146 FPS
high	101 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	96 FPS
medium	79 FPS	81 FPS
high	66 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	425 FPS	509 FPS
medium	359 FPS	414 FPS
high	292 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	338 FPS
medium	229 FPS	269 FPS
high	186 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	157 FPS
medium	95 FPS	130 FPS
high	77 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	855 FPS	540 FPS
medium	693 FPS	432 FPS
high	609 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	405 FPS
medium	527 FPS	324 FPS
high	452 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	270 FPS
medium	355 FPS	216 FPS
high	308 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
1080p
low	775 FPS	540 FPS
medium	639 FPS	432 FPS
high	558 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	270 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	405 FPS
medium	503 FPS	324 FPS
high	435 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	270 FPS
medium	322 FPS	216 FPS
high	298 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	135 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO V710

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 88.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score	22,651+89%	12,000
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352+26%	3456
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	27.65 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+27%	2000 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	136	216+59%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+473%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	54+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 1.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO V710
TDP	160W	158W-1%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+87%	75.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 80% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 846.7% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).