GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO V710

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO V710

2024Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 27.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 846.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 401.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 88.8% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 12,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon PRO V710 has no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,601 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 846.2% (56.8 vs 6.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 88.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 136 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score
22,651+89%
12,000
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4352+26%
3456
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS
27.65 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+27%
2000 MHz
ROPs
48
96+100%
TMUs
136
216+59%
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+473%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
34
54+59%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO V710 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO V710 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCN 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 1.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
TDP
160W
158W-1%
Recommended PSU
550W
500W-9%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+87%
75.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 80% cheaper ($1601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 846.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon PRO V710
MSRP
$399-80%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
56.8+847%
6.0
Codename
AD106
Navi 32
Release
May 18 2023
October 3 2024
Ranking
#59
#196

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.