
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+278.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $264 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅+278.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $264 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX A400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX A400

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 278.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 136 Tensor cores vs 24.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+279% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+715% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+44% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+467% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+467% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 136+467% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+18% | 119.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 66.2% less ($264 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 28.2% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $135-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+28% | 44.3 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #59 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












