
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅21.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌112.8% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 57.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 136 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+58% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+30% | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+30% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 205.2+45% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 53% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 236.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-53% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+236% | 16.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | GB206 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














