G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅343.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 813.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌69.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 68W.
❌18.2% longer card at 240mm vs 203mm.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 68W instead of 115W, a 47W reduction.
✅Measures 203mm instead of 240mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
67.2% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 343.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 446% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 3,580), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro K2200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 813.1% (65.4 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K2200's 3,580 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 446%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
G3D Mark Score	19,548+446%	3,580
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+380%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+950%	1.439 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+119%	1124 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	96+140%	40
L1 Cache	3 MB+868%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K2200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 51.4% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
TDP	115W	68W-41%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	203mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C-3%	75°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+223%	52.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 40.2% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.2 (Quadro K2200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 808.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2200
MSRP	$299-40%	$500
Performance per Dollar	65.4+808%	7.2
Codename	AD107	GM107
Release	May 18 2023	July 22 2014
Ranking	#84	#534

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.