
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+217.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2292.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,149 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌652.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅+217.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2292.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,149 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌652.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro K5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K5200

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K5200's 6,149 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 217.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+218% | 6,149 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+325% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+219% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 28.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+29% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 26.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-23% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+315% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 86.7% less ($1951 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2322.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-87% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+2322% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | GK110B |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #391 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












