G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+177% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.

Quadro M5000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 19,548).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Quadro M5000M

2015

Why buy it

✅+177% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,056 vs 19,548).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro M5000M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 7,056 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro M5000M is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 177.0% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 177.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M5000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M5000M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Quadro M5000M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
1080p
low	167 FPS	105 FPS
medium	152 FPS	89 FPS
high	134 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	89 FPS
medium	114 FPS	75 FPS
high	99 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	36 FPS
medium	74 FPS	32 FPS
high	62 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M5000M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
1080p
low	392 FPS	203 FPS
medium	334 FPS	174 FPS
high	268 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	151 FPS
medium	209 FPS	125 FPS
high	169 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	85 FPS
medium	98 FPS	71 FPS
high	82 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M5000M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
1080p
low	812 FPS	318 FPS
medium	642 FPS	254 FPS
high	551 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	159 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	238 FPS
medium	443 FPS	191 FPS
high	379 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	159 FPS
medium	297 FPS	127 FPS
high	234 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	79 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M5000M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
1080p
low	746 FPS	219 FPS
medium	613 FPS	186 FPS
high	536 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	127 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	172 FPS
medium	486 FPS	149 FPS
high	421 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	97 FPS
medium	308 FPS	76 FPS
high	285 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M5000M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro M5000M

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro M5000M's 7,056 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 177%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M5000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 (Quadro M5000M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1051 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
G3D Mark Score	19,548+177%	7,056
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+100%	1,536
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+405%	2.995 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+134%	1051 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	96
L1 Cache	3 MB+436%	0.56 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M5000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro M5000M's 100W — a 14% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro M5000M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M5000M
TDP	115W	100W-13%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+141%	70.6