
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅53.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌91.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 60W.
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 115W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅53.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 115W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌91.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 91 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 8,119 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 140.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) with 96 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+141% | 8,119 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+170% | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+102% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+30% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 36+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 288+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 62.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 60W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+26% | 135.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | TU106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #313 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












