
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+279.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 280.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,150 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅+279.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 280.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,150 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M295X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 5,150 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 279.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+280% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+410% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M295X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M295X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 54.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+55% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+725% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 280.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+280% | 17.2 |
| Codename | AD107 | Amethyst |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












