
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 590
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+109.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 95.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 175W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,315 vs 19,548).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌52.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅+109.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 95.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 175W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,315 vs 19,548).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌52.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 590?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 590 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 105 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 590

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 590's 9,315 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 109.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+110% | 9,315 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+112% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+59% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+436% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 590 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 590 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) — a 6.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 590) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+6% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 41.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-34% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+220% | 53.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. The Radeon RX 590 costs 6.7% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 95.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $279-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+96% | 33.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












