GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU vs Quadro RTX 8000
GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+500%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 8000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU and Quadro RTX 8000
GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,555 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU scores 19,555 and the Quadro RTX 8000 reaches 19,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,555 | 19,927+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+67% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+146% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+47% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+67% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 576+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro RTX 8000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 200% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 768 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU draws 285W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 9.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 260W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.6 | 76.6+12% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $9999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $9999 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #11 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU and Quadro RTX 8000
