
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅84.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (264 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌159.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅21.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 264).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 285W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌12.6% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 6.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 264 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828+6% | 29,964 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448+230% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS+452% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 264+65% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB+232% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66+65% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | 320+21% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 88.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 310mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 110W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 310mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7 | 272.4+144% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER came in at $799, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER was 11.2% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 19.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-11% | $900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+20% | 33.3 |
| Codename | AD103 | TU104 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #10 | #201 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














