
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 355W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.3 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌24.6% higher power demand at 355W vs 285W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 264 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828+2% | 31,285 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448+38% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS | 61.39 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+4% | 2498 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 192+100% |
| TMUs | 264 | 384+45% |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB+177% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | 96+45% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX carries 24 GB. Radeon RX 7900 XTX gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 960 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 384-bit on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 960 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 21.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 287mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-20% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-6% | 800W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 287mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | 68°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7+27% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER came in at $799, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER was 20% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 27.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+27% | 31.3 |
| Codename | AD103 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #10 | #12 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














