
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅74.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌197% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 165W.
- ❌29.2% longer card at 310mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 285W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 310mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅74.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 285W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 310mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌197% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 165W.
- ❌29.2% longer card at 310mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than Radeon RX 7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 933 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 752 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 749 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 674 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 609 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31,828 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 92%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 66 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 264 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,828+92% | 16,581 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 8448+313% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 44.1 TFLOPS+103% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 2655 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 264+106% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 8.3 MB+1560% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66+106% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+133% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 53.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 165W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 550W-27% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 8-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-4% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 111.7+11% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 66.3% less ($530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 54.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $269-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8 | 61.6+55% |
| Codename | AD103 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 8 2024 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #10 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












