GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (24 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4080.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (310mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $1,649 for the GeForce RTX 4090, it costs 51% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 86.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+86.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($800) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,649) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 scores 34,445 versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 38,112 — the GeForce RTX 4090 leads by 10.6%. The GeForce RTX 4080 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090). Raw compute: 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 128 (GeForce RTX 4090) with 304 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34,445 | 38,112+11% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728 | 16384+68% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+69% |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 304 | 512+68% |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | 16 MB+68% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 128+68% |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 512+68% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) — a 37% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+37% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 draws 320W versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 450W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 310mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W-29% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-25% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 310mm | 304mm |
| Height | 140mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 107.6+27% | 84.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the GeForce RTX 4090 launched at $1599 and now averages $1649. The GeForce RTX 4080 costs 51.5% less ($849 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.1 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 23.1 (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4080 offers 86.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-25% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800-51% | $1649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.1+87% | 23.1 |
| Codename | AD103 | AD102 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #7 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 4090
