
GeForce RTX 4080

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 4080 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4080 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4080 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅4.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 304).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌233.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4080 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 scores 34,445 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 13.8%. The GeForce RTX 4080 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 304 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34,445+14% | 30,269 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728 | 12800+32% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz | 2550 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 304 | 400+32% |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | 12.5 MB+32% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 100+32% |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 400+32% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4080 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4080 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation carries 32 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 27.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 4080 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736 GB/s+28% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 draws 320W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 24.6% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 250W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 107.6 | 121.1+13% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4080 came in at $1199, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4080 was 70% cheaper ($2801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.7 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4080 offers 277.6% better value. The newer card here is RTX 5000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-70% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7+278% | 7.6 |
| Codename | AD103 | AD102 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #7 | #16 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














