
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅10.2% more average FPS across 9 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 304).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 across 9 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌233.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4080
2022RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.2% more average FPS across 9 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.7 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 304).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 across 9 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌233.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 better than RTX 5000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 5000 Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 4080?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 749 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 577 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 748 FPS |
| high | 999 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 775 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 988 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 990 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 878 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 687 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 486 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 scores 34,445 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 13.8%. The GeForce RTX 4080 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 304 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34,445+14% | 30,269 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728 | 12800+32% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz | 2550 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 304 | 400+32% |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | 12.5 MB+32% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 100+32% |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 400+32% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4080 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4080 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 27.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736 GB/s+28% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 draws 320W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 24.6% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 310mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 250W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 310mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 107.6 | 121.1+13% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 MSRP, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. The GeForce RTX 4080 costs 70% less ($2801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.7 (GeForce RTX 4080) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4080 offers 277.6% better value. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-70% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7+278% | 7.6 |
| Codename | AD103 | AD102 |
| Release | September 20 2022 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #7 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












