GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 7600
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 63.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7600.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+63.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-63.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon RX 7600
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 27,048 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 63.1%. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 304 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,048+63% | 16,581 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+375% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 32.98 TFLOPS+52% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2655 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 304+138% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+1800% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+3100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76+138% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+100% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+3100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 31.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-27% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 225.4+124% | 100.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon RX 7600
