
GeForce RTX 5060

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 5060
2025Why buy it
- ✅41.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (120 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌107.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅60% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 120).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 145W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌568.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 69.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5060 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 5060
The GeForce RTX 5060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2497 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,836 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5060 scores 20,836 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 19.18 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2497 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) with 120 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,836 | 20,669 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 6144+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2497 MHz+60% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 192+60% |
| L1 Cache | 3.8 MB | 6 MB+58% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 48+60% |
| Tensor Cores | 120 | 192+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5060 is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5060 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 5060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 5060 and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+60% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 6th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 draws 145W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 69.8% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 145W | 70W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 143.7 | 295.3+105% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 5060 came in at $299, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5060 was 85% cheaper ($1700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 69.7 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 5060 offers 576.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5060 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.7+577% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GB206 | AD104 |
| Release | May 19 2025 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #69 | #71 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














