
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4090

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4090
Why is GeForce RTX 4090 better than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?
Comparing the newer GeForce RTX 5070 Ti to the legendary GeForce RTX 4090 is a battle between the next-gen mid-high tier and the previous flagship king. The RTX 4090, despite being from the Ada Lovelace generation, remains a brute-force champion with 16,384 CUDA cores and 24GB of GDDR6X on a wide 384-bit bus. The RTX 5070 Ti is built on the advanced Blackwell architecture, featuring 8,960 cores and 16GB of GDDR7 memory.
In terms of benchmarks, the RTX 4090 generally maintains a lead in raw rasterization and high-resolution 4K performance due to its massive core count and higher power limits (450W vs 300W). However, the RTX 5070 Ti brings several modern advantages: it is significantly more power-efficient, utilizes faster GDDR7 memory technology, and supports the latest DLSS 4 features, which may bridge the gap in specific titles with advanced Frame Generation.
Ultimately, the GeForce RTX 4090 remains the superior card for users who need the absolute highest raw throughput and a massive 24GB VRAM buffer for 8K gaming or extreme professional tasks. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the more refined and efficient modern choice, offering extreme performance that rivals the previous high-end while being easier to cool and more affordable. If you are upgrading today, the choice depends on whether you value uncapped raw power (4090) or the latest Blackwell efficiencies and AI features (5070 Ti).
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (24 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+17%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $850 versus $1,649 for the GeForce RTX 4090, it costs 48% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 65.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($850) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,649) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and GeForce RTX 4090

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.

GeForce RTX 4090
The GeForce RTX 4090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38,112 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 32,587 versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 38,112 — the GeForce RTX 4090 leads by 17%. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 16,384 (GeForce RTX 4090). Raw compute: 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090). Boost clocks: 2452 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 128 (GeForce RTX 4090) with 280 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,587 | 38,112+17% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 16384+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 43.94 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+88% |
| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | 2520 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 280 | 512+83% |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 16 MB+82% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 128+83% |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 512+83% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 4090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 896 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4090). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4090's 450W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 4090). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 304mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 88 C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-25% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 304mm | 304mm |
| Height | 137mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 88 C | 80°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.6+28% | 84.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti launched at $749 MSRP and currently averages $850, while the GeForce RTX 4090 launched at $1599 and now averages $1649. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti costs 48.5% less ($799 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.3 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 23.1 (GeForce RTX 4090) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 65.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-53% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $850-48% | $1649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+66% | 23.1 |
| Codename | GB203 | AD102 |
| Release | February 20 2025 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #9 | #4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














