GeForce RTX 5090 D vs GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 5090 D
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4080
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 19.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (32 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4080.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+19.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-19.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $1,999 for the GeForce RTX 5090 D, it costs 60% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 109.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+109.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,999) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 D and GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 5090 D
The GeForce RTX 5090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41,059 points. Launch price was $2,299.
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5090 D scores 41,059 versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 34,445 — the GeForce RTX 5090 D leads by 19.2%. The GeForce RTX 5090 D is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4080 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4080) with 680 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41,059+19% | 34,445 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+124% | 9728 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+115% | 48.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2505 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 176+57% | 112 |
| TMUs | 680+124% | 304 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+124% | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+124% | 76 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+124% | 304 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5090 D lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5090 D comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) — a 143.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 D. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s+143% | 736 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080). Decoder: NVDEC 8th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 8th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 D draws 575W versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 320W — a 57% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4080). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 310mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 320W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 750W-25% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 310mm |
| Height | 137mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 107.6+51% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5090 D launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199 and now averages $800. The GeForce RTX 5090 D is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1199-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $800 |
| Codename | GB202 | AD103 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #1 | #7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5090 D and GeForce RTX 4080
