GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce4 MX 4000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 282180% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 MX 4000.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-282180%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+282180%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 115164.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce4 MX 4000.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+115164.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 MX 4000 and GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 4000 scores 5 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 282180%. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 14,114+282180% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1920+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1680 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 MX 4000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+71% |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 4000 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 100mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-17% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 88.2+44000% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce4 MX 4000 costs 59.2% less ($71 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 117500% better value. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-59% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 117.6+117500% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU106 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #523 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 MX 4000 and GeForce RTX 2060
