GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce4 MX 4000
Popular choices:
GeForce4 Ti 4600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce4 MX 4000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+20%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $49 for the GeForce4 MX 4000, it costs 18% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 47% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 MX 4000 and GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
GeForce4 Ti 4600
The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 4000 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+167% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+256% | 0.9072 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 MX 4000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 has 128 MB. The GeForce4 MX 4000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 4000 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The GeForce4 Ti 4600 costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 offers 0% better value. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 4000 | GeForce4 Ti 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $40-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | July 12 2010 |
| Ranking | #523 | #652 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 MX 4000 and GeForce4 Ti 4600
