GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • GeForce4 Ti 4600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
  • 2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010

Why buy it

  • +20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
  • 28.6% longer card at 216mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 MX 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 MX 4000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 4000 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
G3D Mark Score
5
6+20%
Architecture
Turing
Fermi
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896+167%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+256%
0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+14%
56

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 4000 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce4 MX 4000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 4000 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
DirectX
7.0
8.1+16%
OpenGL
1.5+15%
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs No.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
MPEG-2 Decoder
No
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 4000 draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
TDP
25W-84%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
216mm
Height
100mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60°C-8%
65°C
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 MX 4000 came in at $0, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 4000 was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce4 MX 4000) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 4000 (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce4 MX 4000GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP
$0-100%
$399
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.0
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GF104
Release
August 1 2020
July 12 2010
Ranking
#523
#652

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.